It automatically detects what is not installed (in other words any new content since K9U in my case, since I already have EVERYTHING from that package installed and updated to the latest version on the computer). (Not on the HD, but from within Native Access). Once that's done, the content becomes visible. It then detects that you have the drive plugged in and prompts you to enter the serial number. Since I already had that installed on my computer, I didn't need to install it. You cannot view any of the content on the drive other than the Native Access installer. You get a box containing a USB drive and a card w/ a serial number. OK, K11U update arrived today from Sweetwater and I'm in the process of installing it now. I mean, all the RAM in my MacPro is Crucial, so I obviously trust them with volatile solid-state memory. If anything, it runs a little faster than the 1Tb 850 EVO did when it was filled to the virtual brim. The specs say it's slightly slower, but I certainly can't feel the difference when a new project opens. So I have direct experience with replacing an 850 EVO with a Crucial MX3000, which has been running my VIs every day since April 26th. I am using it as a libraries drive over eSATA. Just went through the same thing, and the same reasoning: all my other internal SSDs are Samsung 850s, but when it came time to replace my 1Tb "Samples" drive (the LASS set and Cinesamples winds, brass and percussion drove me near the cliff, NI updates drove me over), the lower price of the 2Tb Crucial was significant enough to make me buy it. Anyone have experience with the 2T MX300? I'd be using it as a libraries drive only over eSATA. As great as the 850 EVO is, it runs about $150 more than the Crucial MX300. Mikehalloran wrote:Speaking of which, if I do buy Ultimate, I'll need another 2T drive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |